Infallible isn’t even on the table. You’re saying theres something fallible with a COMPLETE LACK OF LOGIC OR EVIDENCE.
No one agrees with you, you have no standing… That has nothing to do with the “fallibility” of anything… if anything you’re the one pretending to be infallible as you pretend to be correct while offering zero reason, justification or defense.
I’m a bit confused — are you talking to me, or about Amber Heard? Feeling pretty attacked, which, if that was your goal, congratulations I guess?
For what it’s worth, I honestly did not follow the case very closely and what I did see was tons of conflicting narratives depending on where I was reading or hearing about it. I have no idea who to believe. Probably they’re both shitty people.
None of this has anything to do with my comment about the justice system, which was in response to yours asking about the verdict, compensation, etc. as though those things mean truth. I don’t believe they do mean truth; I’ve had personal limited experience suggesting otherwise and there are plenty of cases that have ruined people’s lives that were later overturned.
I’m not trying to be combative, but I feel a bit defensive because of what feels to me like vitriol from a random online commenter. If I misunderstood, I apologize.
This assumes the legal system is infallible.
Infallible isn’t even on the table. You’re saying theres something fallible with a COMPLETE LACK OF LOGIC OR EVIDENCE.
No one agrees with you, you have no standing… That has nothing to do with the “fallibility” of anything… if anything you’re the one pretending to be infallible as you pretend to be correct while offering zero reason, justification or defense.
I’m a bit confused — are you talking to me, or about Amber Heard? Feeling pretty attacked, which, if that was your goal, congratulations I guess?
For what it’s worth, I honestly did not follow the case very closely and what I did see was tons of conflicting narratives depending on where I was reading or hearing about it. I have no idea who to believe. Probably they’re both shitty people.
None of this has anything to do with my comment about the justice system, which was in response to yours asking about the verdict, compensation, etc. as though those things mean truth. I don’t believe they do mean truth; I’ve had personal limited experience suggesting otherwise and there are plenty of cases that have ruined people’s lives that were later overturned.
I’m not trying to be combative, but I feel a bit defensive because of what feels to me like vitriol from a random online commenter. If I misunderstood, I apologize.