Proposal Assembly 2026: ToU extension to prohibit LLM-extrusions
codeberg.org
Here is the proposed addition for the ToU that @Gusted and I agreed on post-assembly for the upcoming membership vote. 🙏 The discussion for this proposal is available for Codeberg e. V. members in the forum: https://forum.codeberg.org/d/139-resolutions-for-assembly-on-codeberg-taking-a-stand-a...
  • kayazere@feddit.nlEnglish
    12·
    13 hours ago

    The main argument is due to copyright issues of LLM generated code. Github will happily remove repos which violated copyright laws or IP laws. It makes sense that Codeberg doesn’t want to host code which may be violating copyright law.

    • XLE@piefed.socialEnglish
      2·
      8 hours ago

      And anybody could try to take down your repository by pointing to copyright law in general. Bad faith takedowns are not a new phenomenon.

    • Fedditor385@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      8 hours ago

      Then why not say it’s not allowed to upload code you don’t have copyright to? This would make sense, nobody would question it and it would generally also cover AI-generated code.

      Mentioning vibe coding just upgraded it into a social and moral topic, while the sole fact that AI generated code is no issue at all, just that there is not a general concensus in the world who holds the copyright to that code.

      It’s kinda like blanked banning cooking, because you can’t cook without a knife, and knife can be used as a weapon.