• if we are to raise livestock for consumption they should be treated as the sentient

    this is a contradiction in itself.

    It is normal and healthy for people to empathize with the animals they eat, to be concerned about whether or not they are living happy lives and to hope they are slaughtered humanely. However, if it is unethical to harm these animals, then it is more unethical to kill them.

    Killing animals for food is far worse than making them suffer. Of course, it is admirable that people care so deeply about these animals that they take deliberate steps to reduce their suffering (e.g. by purchasing “free-range” eggs or “suffering free” meat). However, because they choose not to acknowledge the right of those same animals to live out their natural lives, and because slaughtering them is a much greater violation than mistreatment, people who eat ‘humane’ meat are laboring under an irreconcilable contradiction.

    from https://yourveganfallacyis.com/en/humane-meat

    • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 seconds ago

      The “natural life” of all animals bred for meat ends with their slaughter, by definition. Otherwise they wouldn’t exist? Their purpose is not to die of old age, that itself would be a horribly cruel existence.

      None of these creatures exist in nature. If they’re going to exist at all, why not give the best life and fulfillment of purpose if you can?

    • Awooooooga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I don’t even eat meat and I disagree completely with that lol. There is nothing wrong or unnatural about killing animals for food. There is something wrong and unnatural about abusing the lives of those animals and treating them with no respect.