Often, we call the stages of a star its “life cycle”, and I’ve been thinking about this for a bit.

Stars meet many of the requirements for living organisms: they can consume matter, they can react to stimuli (sort of, does gravity count? e.g. binary systems), they can reproduce (they expel gas clouds on death that can eventually create new stars), they can grow and change size over their lifespan, and they maintain equilibrium (between gravity and radiation pressure from fusion)

What stops stars from being considered living objects?

edit: as it turns out, the formation of new stars after death doesn’t really count as reproduction, and gravity shouldn’t count as stimuli (a rock experiences gravity too, but it doesn’t react to stimuli)

  • Lucy [she/faer]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    they can reproduce (they expel gas clouds on death that can eventually create new stars)

    I wouldn’t consider being eaten by a pregnant predator who then gives birth to be a form of reproduction even if I supplied resources to the born creature.

    they can grow and change size over their lifespan

    So can oceans but I don’t think it should count as growing.