Zero surprise. Anybody who’s edited anything political on Wikipedia realizes that it’s completely gate-kept by libs and similar right-wingers to reinforce the “western” (white) hegemonic narrative.
That was a very interesting read. I hope we get some follow-up on this, and maybe other such reports as well. It does sound highly problematic, and like a very toxic work environment.
Literally every post this bot makes is to take a shit on Wikipedia. They have an agenda.
Oh I absolutely should start reading usernames here. Didn’t notice that…
I mean… yeah. Duh. They say so openly on the website, that’s the point.
They observed wrongdoing, were fired for opposing it and now they are trying to highlight that and make it public.
Whether the whole thing is TRUE is the question. I don’t know that. I guess it’s a reminder that ultimately everything online could be fake and false and manipulation. We would need more sources with similar stories. But if everyone didn’t publish because they would be the first, we would never get multiple sources.
So, just read it as a biased perspective and leave it unsolved whether it’s true or false…
I’m not talking about the website that was linked. I’m talking about the bot OP that posted the link.
