https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_credit_system

Pretty sure social credit actually exists tho. No? It’s a fairy tale? smh.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_credit_system

WOOOSH!

They’re high-fiving themselves about being able to buy a house. DUR.

Under capitalism basic human needs are allocated only to the most privileged.

Many many libs celebrate their participation in this privilege, especially in terms of housing.

State-enforced privilege is basically the entire goal of liberalism.

In a world where credit is allocated on the basis of trust,

lol jfc. What world are you talking about?

Credit is allocated based on people printing money, starting wars, murdering people, etc.

Yes like every state. Capitalism is entirely based on the violent control of people and things.

I love my country,

Not even sure how to respond to this kind of vague emotional ideology. When people say this to me in person, I back away slowly.

Is that Mr. Bean in the chair? If not, it should be.

the fascists are the one that put the algorithms in place.

Actually no. Every single program is an “algorithm”. Sorting by date is an “algorithm”.

You’re literally crying about something that’s ubiquitous. And that’s literally how we got here.

Do you really want more state control of “social media”? You want these wonderful fash controlling those dangerous algorithms? smh.

Yeah “centricism” is just privileged fascism. It’s the privilege of being completely ignorant and complacent while people are genocided, concentration camped, etc.

Overt fascism definitely drives more clicks.

“Moderates” are right-wing, just like liberals.

We have overt fascists literally controlling the internet and people are still spouting complaints about “algorithms”. jfc.

Seriously who upvotes this nonsense? This is how we got here.

DAE remember all the libs calling for state control of TikTok? Still calling for state control of “social media”?

This is what they gave us.

Liberalism <—> Fascism.

I’m hopeful that imperial slop fails on liberated devices.

This is not a religion.

It can be if you want.

Yeah that’s why fascism is winning. Nobody is willing to stand up to the fascists.

You would lose all the worthless proprietary software that you’re hoarding for no reason.

No need for ageism. They’re not grandparents.

They’re officials, military, journalists, etal. for empire. Ultra-privileged stooges. What else should we expect?

Clickbait. Downvote.

I guess this is an attempt to slander Signal, since Whatsapp is not even close to being secure.

These bills are written by people who are clearly or maliciously tech illiterate and don’t understand either the terminology or the practical impacts.

They’re paid by people who understand all of this very well and will profit. That’s the whole reason this exists.

I can’t imagine these definitions aren’t vague enough that they can’t be weaponized against basically anything software.

Yes, that’s the point. The more vague the “laws”, the more control.

It’s why libs have been lobbying for state control of “social media”. It’s a meaningless term that represents state control of all social interactions. That’s the actual goal.

Next concern is moving the age verification to a corporation, at which point the dystopia is real.

The state is bad enough. Selling us off to a subsidiary will be just another insult.