Does anyone really believe that “AI” can replace sex work experts?

I use more post-enshittification tech. I’ve replaced most of the apps on my phone with open source versions.

I’ve never used proprietary software on my Linux computers so there’s no enshittification there. But I have stopped using my enshittified android TV in favor of Kodi on Linux.

Ok cool… But what about the other factor?

(jk)

PTB. That comm is liberal garbage that’s supportive of fascist attacks. No surprise they’re pushing sketchy news.

Don’t even look at my random wire collection.

Kodi. Why just stream when you can have movies/TV, IPTV, games, Podcasts, youtube, BandCamp, Mixcloud, weather, etc… I’m pretty sure there are addons for Netflix and that kind of proprietary stuff for people with accounts.

I recommend compiling from source for latest/fastest. It can be a project to set everything up, but I’ve been loving mine since I got it rolling.

I’m using a Flirc too. Highly recommend.

The main difference is that rockets are expressly for the purpose of murdering people, so I would argue that the research shouldn’t be continued or done at all.

Fortunately I’m pretty sure that people developing these computer programs are serious about trying not to murder people - even if just for legal reasons.

How do you measure that?

The other day I did a google search for a basic JavaScript function. Gemini gave me almost the exact function that I needed. Should I have closed my eyes or smashed my head with a hammer until I forgot? Ofc I used it. It was the first result, helpful, and easy.

I don’t believe in “AI” since it doesn’t exist, but these augmented or summarized searches can definitely be helpful. I imagine it’s the same with other LLMs, search engines, etc.

People are begging to regulate “AI” when it doesn’t even exist and there’s not even an objective definition.

Absolute recipe for failure or worse.

Yes, debugging with an LLM is absolutely as bad as murder. Probably worse! \s

also the number of bugs is not a bottomless pit.

Are you forgetting about Microsoft?

Yes, but this has always been the case before and after this phony “AI” bullshit.

Avoiding false statements achieves scientific accuracy and honest progress rather than grifting and bullshit.

And TBH it’s not at all difficult for me to distinguish between my computer and a human.

That’s a core part of the grift. Even people who supposed hate “AI” still promote this kind of anthropomorphic disinformation. It’s rampant.

Pretty wild seeing a programmer anthropomorphize their applications and mislabel them as “AI”.

The Big Lai runs deep.

why people treat AI-generated code like it’s the Plague 2

It’s just another part of the grift. The so-called “resistance” actually promotes the Big Lai that “AI” exists.

Clickbait feeding the Big Lai.

In reality there was no “AI” involved because it doesn’t exist.

Dude used a LLM which is a statistical program with absolutely zero “intelligence”.

What do they need to draft people for?

They only need a few brainwashed children to fly drones from an air conditioned trailer.

Empire of cowards.

Imagine being fucking 42 and still willing to kill/die for this shithole country. wew.

When someone gets a tattoo, do they usually claim they were the artist

No, because there’s a human right there doing the actual work.

With computer generation (aka “AI”) there’s just one person and a computer hooked up to the internet. You can claim that the people on the internet broadly deserve the credit - including the people who wrote the computer program. But that’s nothing like getting a tattoo.