cm0002@mander.xyz to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 1 day agoWho said free markets can't deliver for the consumerlemmy.mlimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1225
arrow-up1225imageWho said free markets can't deliver for the consumerlemmy.mlcm0002@mander.xyz to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 1 day agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-squareTar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 day agoSo a random sample will contain 1.4 times as much coke, for 80% of the cost.
minus-squarefrank@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·21 hours agoPresumably 40% less non-coke inclusion. So if before it was 90% coke and 10% cut, it’d be 94/6
minus-squareTar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·12 hours agoThat makes a lot more sense. Or the quality was originally absolutely terrible.
minus-squareRicaz@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·20 hours agoSpecifically from around 40-50% to 70-80%. It’s impossible to get more than roughly 85-90% purity as that’s the purity they export.
minus-squareslevinkelevra@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agoNot one random sample but the average of all samples.
minus-squareTar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoThe random sample collectively.
minus-squareARGVMI~1.PIF@mastodon.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day ago@SCmSTR That’s 40% more coke per coke! @Tar_alcaran
minus-squareSCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoWhat… Is your instance name
So a random sample will contain 1.4 times as much coke, for 80% of the cost.
Presumably 40% less non-coke inclusion. So if before it was 90% coke and 10% cut, it’d be 94/6
That makes a lot more sense. Or the quality was originally absolutely terrible.
Specifically from around 40-50% to 70-80%.
It’s impossible to get more than roughly 85-90% purity as that’s the purity they export.
Not one random sample but the average of all samples.
The random sample collectively.
My coke has more coke!
@SCmSTR
That’s 40% more coke per coke!
@Tar_alcaran
What… Is your instance name