• rafoix@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 day ago

    I would use eminent domain to take away the land from data centers and make public parks. I can easily make a case for public parks.

  • eicker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    The weird part is that everyone keeps calling it public infrastructure, but if the primary beneficiary is a handful of private AI companies, that argument starts looking pretty thin. Reliable grids benefit everyone. Dedicated power corridors for hyperscalers are a much harder sell, especially when locals bear the costs.

  • GreatWhiteBuffalo41@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 day ago

    Absolutely disgusting. Not that they didn’t use this as pure racism during the expansions of major interstates through major cities. It’s not new. It’s just disgusting when it happens.

    • False@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      We do. In Seattle at least, it’s been used for expanding public transit light rail. The problem is that you still have to pay people for their land that you’re taking away - and in a city like Seattle that gets very expensive very quickly. And that’s not even accounting for the political cost.

      However, if you’re in a part of the country with cheap land, then it’s less prohibitive to use.

    • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because usually in those cases the land belongs to those with means. In this case it’ll be those who can’t fight back effectively (cause our legal system is designed to favor the wealthy).