• FishFace@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Peanuts are nuts. You can tell because:

    • They have “nut” in the name
    • If you buy a bag of “mixed nuts”, it often has peanuts in
    • If someone asks whether something contains nuts, peanuts will be included in the reply
    • In sane markets, a pack of salted peanuts will say “may contain traces of other nuts” in the allergy information

    Peanuts don’t belong to the botanical classification of nuts, but that also doesn’t categorise strawberries as fucking berries so it’s a load of shite.

    If someone did ask you whether something contains nuts, you wouldn’t risk saying “no” if it really contains peanuts, would you? At least, I hope not…

    • Cypher@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      None of what you said is relevant for allergies which is the purpose of the labelling.

        • Velypso@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          If someone is allergic to nuts or peanuts, they know the difference between nut and peanuts.

          As someone who constantly deals with other peoples allergies, I literally never have to clarify the statement of “nut allergy” because a peanut is factually not a nut. Therefore, they are not allergic to them.

          • FishFace@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            If there is any risk of you giving someone who says they have a nut allergy peanuts, you need to immediately change how you handle that, because you are risking putting someone in hospital, or worse. I’m not saying this to prove a stupid internet point; I’m saying this because I genuinely fear you might endanger someone, and you don’t want that.

            I have a nut allergy, and I only learnt of the botanical definition of a nut from know-it-alls on the internet, long after my initial doctor’s appointment. In that appointment, I was told to go easy on peanuts because, even though I had never had a reaction to them (only a different kind of nut), there was a risk of one developing. That would, presumably, have been the time for the doctor to have told me that peanuts aren’t nuts.

            a peanut is factually not a nut

            I hope this over-the-top reply is enough to convince you.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        If I bought a packet of “mixed nuts” I would not expect it to have raisins in, but packets of mixed nuts often contain peanuts.

        Notice I didn’t say “peanuts are nuts because they are packaged with nuts”, but because they are included in a package whose label is just “mixed nuts”.

        See also my other comment here for a number of places where you can see the word “nut” used in a way which includes peanuts (and why it’s important)