In the graph above I’ve arranged the 28 Threadiverse instances with at least 200 monthly active users (MAU)—orange instances running Lemmy, green Piefed, and red Mbin—on the basis of which instances they defederate.
Each instance has its MAU count listed below it, sourced from the latest MAU figures at Fediverse Observer, with adjustments made to the totals for Piefed (due to undercounting by outdated instances, as noted here; I used @Vicinus@piefed.zip’s suggested estimate of 7,200 Piefed users) and Mbin (due to tardigram.com having a duplicate listing).
After adjustments, there are an estimated 43,287 monthly active Threadiverse users (35,184+7,200+903), of whom 87.84% are on the 28 largest instances. The percentages listed alongside the MAU figures correspond to each instance’s share of the total MAU count.
Defederation data was sourced from Federation Checker. The tool doesn’t support Mbin instances, so I left fedia.io in its own category. If any defederations are missing, feel free to let me know. Ideally such a chart should also include community blocks to better illustrate which instances block what, but that data doesn’t appear to be as easily searchable.
I also noticed cases of some instances being listed as being defederated by another instance, despite not appearing on the defederation list for that instance (i.e. reddthat.com and lemmygrad.ml are listed as being mutually blocked, despite neither having the other on their block lists). In testing that federation, I noticed that !wholesome@reddthat.com did not federate to Lemmygrad while !memes@reddthat.com did, so clarification on that matter would be helpful.
While I’ll update my generalized chart as needed to correct errors, perhaps at some point an automated federation mapping tool similar to the one feddit.de formerly hosted could be developed to more completely illustrate instance federation.


This is untrue, a common criticism about china on hexbear is their continued trade with the zionist entity for instance. There is especially quite a bit of criticism of Russia, especially about their homophobia and stamping out of worker initiatives.
I have yet to see an instance where a person respectfully disagreeing gets modded. I’ve been on hexbear for 3 years and I’ve seen people post about every topic under the sun. Yeah if you come in and post tank man with some smug one-line people will respond in kind, but I have also seen good-faith discussion with liberals and on contentious topics
This is not what happened. I know this because you’re talking about me[1] and there was no suicide-baiting involved. What happened was that a user posted a “cutesy” comic about the SA scene in stardew valley involving Shane with no content warning. In the scene Shane kisses the farmer out of nowhere, without their consent and later apologises is for it because he knows it’s wrong. The comic even goes further into the “poor Shane just needs some love” angle than the game itself iirc.
I pointed this out at first politely:
Then the mod of that community came out to defend with this stuff like “it’s posted in the stardew valley community”, “it’s just a game”, “shane’s really depressed and an alcoholic”, “the playable character has shown interest in them” all in one reply. Just a cornucopia of SA apologia. Now I’m not gonna pretend that I was absolutely clear-headed here. A person very close to me struggles with CPTSD, and on a bad day a comic like that might have sent them into a seizure, might even have hospitalized them for a day depending on how they fell when they seize up. And that’s the more violent, visual part. It affects them every day, it has literally disabled them, it robbed them of their future this is not “just a game”.
So the first time I say “I wanna shoot you. It’s just a comment.” this is in in direct response to his “it’s just a game”. The full line is
I wanted to highlight here the kind of violence we are talking about that is getting pushed aside with “just a game”, in a “what if it was targeted at you, but brushed aside as ‘just a comment’” kind of way. Admittedly I could have phrased that more clearly but I was very agitated. I believe emotions are an important part of conversations and showing that this is important to me on an emotional level and not just a debate where we trade arguments was important. Also I was trying to vent my anger at this whole aspect of society in what turned out to be an unproductive way.
The doubling down on it was me getting more agitated because I heard these trivializations myself in real life and I have to grit my teeth and look for a diplomatic way of resolution, the name of the game becomes harm minimization, and processing it later in a safe environment. It can take days to get back to a normal daily routing not to mention the injurious effects of repeatedly getting confronted with people downplaying or ignoring their trauma. So not having to do harm minimization here I fly off the handle. I believe there is a special place in hell for people (and especially men) who refuse to stand down and defend this kind of shit, but it’s not my place to send them there.
The “tripling” down is actually me backing off and simply saying “I hope [they] die soon”. Because at that point they even acknowledged the harm that the comic can cause but refuse to do anything to mitigate it. So I hope they just go away before they deal more harm.
Firstly, there has been a shift on hexbear away from dunking and more towards explaining but it’s a process. You can check the Code of Conduct on Hexbear that got revised a couple months ago. The “dunking” culture stems from back when the community was on reddit and was a self-defense mechanism to not have to deal with people constantly trying to get smug zingers and one-liners in. It was actually hexbear (then chapotraphouse) that was getting brigaded. And lastly you won’t see me do it again because (and it’s actually that instance that showed me this) because it does more harm then good and doesn’t actually help. So I will continue to swallow my thoughts, be more polite and process them later on.
https://hexbear.net/comment/5518159 ↩︎