vegeta@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoDEF CON bans Meta-style 'pervert glasses'www.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square126fedilinkarrow-up1920
arrow-up1920external-linkDEF CON bans Meta-style 'pervert glasses'www.theregister.comvegeta@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square126fedilink
minus-squarenonentity@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·15 hours agoI’d like to know how well they handle being exposed to IR and/or UV LED flares. Once that experiment has been performed, try a targeted laser turret.
minus-squareLudrol@szmer.infolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·15 hours agoHuman eyes are also sensitive to high intensity IR and UV light so you will also blind a human wearing them. Depending on the wavelength, permanently.
minus-squareGodric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·9 hours agoI’m already in favor of using high-powered lasers, you don’t have to keep convincing me
minus-squareoyzmo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 hours agoLidar would probably do the trick
minus-squarenonentity@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·14 hours agoI meant to include ‘strobe’ in the definition. A low duty cycle would cut down on the biological impact, and rapid, random cycling would help blind the sensors as they try to compensate.
I’d like to know how well they handle being exposed to IR and/or UV LED flares.
Once that experiment has been performed, try a targeted laser turret.
Human eyes are also sensitive to high intensity IR and UV light so you will also blind a human wearing them. Depending on the wavelength, permanently.
I’m already in favor of using high-powered lasers, you don’t have to keep convincing me
Lidar would probably do the trick
I meant to include ‘strobe’ in the definition. A low duty cycle would cut down on the biological impact, and rapid, random cycling would help blind the sensors as they try to compensate.