• psx_crab@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    are you speedrunning some sort of ‘biggest amount of baseless assumptions about another person in one sentence’-title?

    So you said this:

    instead of the daily mail and their weird takes based mostly on hearsay and misconstruction

    You did it first, honey.

    All im pushing back on, is you claiming that ‘its not a functional government’

    I said it’s a functional government, maybe i put it in a wrong way but i mean what i said. If that’s all it take to tick you off then maybe it’s a you problem.

    i didn’t accuse you of saying its a hellhole. The 1952 comment was rhetorically purely for dramatic effect and not a comment about you. Not everything is.

    Didn’t said you accuse me saying that, i simply stated that as a comparison.

    tf has charlie kirk got to do with this?

    Would’ve think an example that come after a statement is pretty obvious thing, but i expect too much it seems.

    • Techno-rat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      aight my bad if i came off as ‘ticked off’, theres a language barrier and some neurodivergence at play here. I dont really vibe with the energy you’re giving off tho, with the ‘guess im expecting too much’, ‘honey’, etc.

      Idrc who started it tbh, lets just say i did, but i dont like the direction the convo took in any case.

      have a good one ✌️