• melfie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Cities typically offer public transport, so I do wonder what it would it would take for a city to run their own ride-sharing service. There are various open source Uber alternatives, but not sure how good any of them are. Marketing and getting people to use something like this would be the hard part for any independent organization, but a city government should have a much easier time getting people to use it.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      The state of Massachusetts runs a paratransit system for people who can’t use public transit. It’s expensive and not great. They’ve started to offload some ridership to Uber and Lyft where it makes sense, e.g. people without wheelchairs.

      • melfie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Government agencies partnering with Uber and Lyft unfortunately does seem to be pretty common, which goes in the opposite direction of creating less exploitative alternatives.

        • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Not if the government sets the fees and wages in the contract and tells them to fuck off and goes with the competitor if they are in breach.