• Manticore@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Quite likely. Many Linux distros aren’t visible because they hide their telemetry, and would be marked as ‘unknown’ - or they spoof Windows or Mac for compatibility reasons. It’d be impossible to get an accurate read on how many computers run Linux, but it’ll be higher than the number that report it.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      AFAIK they get their data through crowd-sourced browser header data. And I really doubt any significant number of people are manipulating that.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      There’s also a question of where they’re measuring this.

      You can’t intercept and inspect the browser telemetry of every web request on the entire internet, that’s just not possible. So they must only have access to the data from requests from a specific set of websites.

      Are those websites a representative sample of all web traffic, or are some of those websites more or less likely to have Linux users than the average website?

      And it seems to be counting per request. Do Linux users visit these websites more often or less often than average? Do they spend more time there and view more pages, or less time and less pages?


      A truly unbiased OS survey is basically impossible. At least, hopefully, they’re using the same measurement data over and over again through time, so maybe the trends in the data are still meaningful.

      • TehPers@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The Cloudflare chart would probably be pretty representative given how much traffic goes through it.