• FishFace@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I haven’t done any scientific comparison of the two groups, and I’m not a member of both groups either so I can’t speak from personal experience either… however, from what I understand, fallible though that may be, it’s simply a combination of the per capita rate, combined with it being pretty easy to get on grindr, hit up a gay bar, or whatever.

    As a result, the relevant comparison isn’t “number of potential partners in the whole population” but “proportion of potential partners in a population I can narrow down to, provided that population is big enough.” Say there are 1,000 gay men on grindr in a town, and 20,000 straight women on tinder in the same town. What I think is true is that a higher proportion of those people on grindr are DTF with some rando than of the women on tinder, so your practical experience as a gay or straight man looking for a no-strings shag will be different.

    But yeah, I guess I should caveat my original message that I can’t be super confident.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I may have worded my response poorly as your explanation is similar to what i meant. If half of the 1000 gay men are DTF that would be 500 potential rando partners or 50% of their population. You would only need 2.5% of the 20,000 women to be DTF to have the same number of 500 potential partners. Regardless if you aren’t confident you won’t be as successful in either group.

    • bus_factor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’m not a member of either populace, but as far as I can tell from online discourse the male tinder experience would depend heavily on how hot they look.