I get it, local papers are struggling to survive and ad revenue is down. And there is a note on the page to identify that it is “sponsored content.” But at first glance it’s visually indistinguishable from any other story or op-ed the paper publishes. This is misleading to casual readers.

For context, there is an ongoing multi-decade legal fight to get the government to remove four large dams on the Snake River in the northwest US. The paid content here is written by a consortium representing organizations which have financial incentives to keep the dams in place.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snake_River#Proposed_dam_removal

    • kersploosh@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      No. I am not sure how we could even craft such a law in the current US legal climate. Political speech, and money tied to political speech, are nearly impossible to regulate in any meaningful way.