cm0002@infosec.pub to Memes@sopuli.xyz · 2 days agoWhile he got the core idea right, he shouldn’t have compared apples to Apple’s.infosec.pubimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1516
arrow-up1516imageWhile he got the core idea right, he shouldn’t have compared apples to Apple’s.infosec.pubcm0002@infosec.pub to Memes@sopuli.xyz · 2 days agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squareblockheadjt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 days agoWhy did you put an apostrophe in a non-possessive plural noun?
minus-squareNekoKoneko@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 days agoWhile this might be a typo, it could also refer to Apple’s idea, which is referenced earlier in the sentence.
minus-squareNigelFrobisher@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 days agoIt’s social commentary on whether the technological product really belongs to the user or the OEM.
minus-squareXeno@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoI’m adopting this interpretation as my headcanon.
Why did you put an apostrophe in a non-possessive plural noun?
While this might be a typo, it could also refer to Apple’s idea, which is referenced earlier in the sentence.
It’s social commentary on whether the technological product really belongs to the user or the OEM.
I’m adopting this interpretation as my headcanon.