• MXX53@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 days ago

      For me it isn’t absolutism. It is about trying to get the most private secure setup I can. Currently, that is Graphene and that required a pixel. If there ever comes a time where another device is supported, preferably one focused on repairability, I will go that way.

    • LoveSausage@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      A fork of GOS for EOL devices would be pretty nice I agree , but GOS doesn’t decise phone security, manufacturers do. Any phone with good enough security would be a target device for GOS.

      Calyx OS usually run longer on EOL so I would go there before lineage.

        • LoveSausage@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          Well . That’s what forks are for. The aim of GOS is not to support a lot of devices. Since it can’t achieve its goals of a reasonable secure device that way. But as I said a fork of GOS would be good , or longer support from calyx. I think I got a year more out of a pixel 3 on calyx OS. But if your goal is maximum security there is no way around the fact that without manufacturers updates and to a certain extent hardware limitations, it won’t be possible to do.

          But best would be a good Linux phone so we can move away from Android all together, hope we can see that soon