• Forester@pawb.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’m failing to see why you seem to be implying that low level exposure is dangerous then as we both seem to agree the current limits are abundantly over cautious as evidenced by high natural background exposure studies.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’m failing to see why you seem to be implying that low level exposure is dangerous then

      I’m not?

      I’m complaining about people who can only go “LNT bad, waaaah”. Put up something better to use.