LibreTechni.ca
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
inari@piefed.zip to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish ·
edit-2
9 hours ago

Damn

media.piefed.zip

message-square
17
fedilink
333

Damn

media.piefed.zip

inari@piefed.zip to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish ·
edit-2
9 hours ago
message-square
17
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Protected Class Action Lawsuit

  • perishthethought@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    The whole 2015 article:

    Sylvia Driskell, a 66-year-old woman from Auburn, Nebraska, filed a federal lawsuit last week titled Driskell v. Homosexuals. Driskell, acting as her own lawyer and the ambassador of “God, And His, Son Jesus Christ,” would like the District Court in Omaha to determine whether being gay is a sin. She did not cite any previous court cases in her petition, which is seven pages long and written in cursive, instead relying on the consul of Merriam-Webster and the Bible. Driskell asks, “Why are judges passing laws, so sinners can break religious, and moral laws. Will all the judges of this Nation, judge God to be a lier [sic].”

    The civil-rights case has been assigned to Judge John M. Gerrard, and no summons have been issued. Many people around the country have been surprised to learn that they were being sued by some person they had never met in Nebraska.

    Man, I hope I get deposed
    — Dan Savage (@fakedansavage) May 5, 2015

    https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2015/05/66-year-old-nebraska-woman-sues-all-gay-people.html

    • boydster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Thankfully I think the gays are off the hook for this crime

      https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/nebraska/nedce/8:2015cv00158/69317/5

      • arctanthrope@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        7 hours ago

        my favorite part is where they explain that for her to claim that this is under the jurisdiction of a federal court, she would have to prove that there are no gay people who are citizens of the state of Nebraska

        • PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Possibly true. If neither she nor the judge are.

          • arctanthrope@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            if I understand correctly, it’s actually because she is. it explains that in order for a civil case to be under the jurisdiction of a federal court (and a civil case must be what she’s attempting, since she doesn’t cite any federal law to allege that the defendants have broken it), none of the plaintiffs can be citizens of the same state as any of the defendants. otherwise, presumably, it would fall under the jurisdiction of whichever state both parties are citizens of. so because both she and some gay people are Nebraskans, the case would have to be handled by a Nebraska state court, not a federal court

            • PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I was making a joke about there being like two people in Nebraska and here you are vomiting up law larp at me.

              • arctanthrope@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 hours ago

                oh, yeah I didn’t get that at all. good premise though, sounds like it woulda been funny

    • root@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      as a Catholic, what

  • massive_bereavement@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    8 hours ago

    For being so fabulous?

    • IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      deleted by creator

      • PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Oh. OH I thought it was because of that night fifteen years ago. I normally wouldn’t go for a lady that old or that particular kind of insane, but I was a little completely wasted.

        • IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Are you stalking me?

          • PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            No, but that’s not a very reassuring thing to say, is it?

  • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touched_by_an_Angel

    This used to hit, if you were either stoned or just sitting, exhausted in the emergency room, waiting for news. Philosophy class was an excellent chaser for either situation

    Someone sued God!? You really need to be high to not get angry about it

    • PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Wish we could sue churches that try to interfere with the fuckers who tax me.

  • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Kirk Cameron is gonna be the prosecution in the movie version on this…

    • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Omg I LOVED him in Shaving Ryan’s Privates

memes@lemmy.world

memes@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !memes@lemmy.world

Community rules

1. Be civil

No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politics

This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent reposts

Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No bots

No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop

No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

  • !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
  • !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
  • !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
  • !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 3.24K users / day
  • 7.75K users / week
  • 12.3K users / month
  • 21K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 22.2K subscribers
  • 5.88K Posts
  • 83K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Tenthrow@lemmy.world
  • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world
  • The Picard Maneuver@startrek.website
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org