• Mountainaire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    @Waffelmeister@lemmy.world is actually boycotting his relationship. I do not think it is wise for him to try to force her into submission rather than leading by a lifetime of example proving that one can get by just fine without Amazon and inspiring rather than coercing her to leave.

    • odioLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Let’s remind ourselves this is a company actively supporting genocide.

      force her into submission

      coercing her to leave

      You conclude there’s forcing and coercion from 2 sentences? I just see two people with apparently incompatible moral values about consumption. I don’t see any forcing or coercion. I think it’s a very valid reason. If he has or is willing to put patience into the relationship is also a decision he has to take.

    • Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Honestly, this is more of a values disparity.

      If two people have different values in some places in life, its normal to have adversity.

      Just because it’s a capitalist themed value, doesnt mean this person is being irrational imo.

      Mostly agree with you, leading by example is the way. I am amazon free, but my fucking goddamn husband, absolutely pays for prime for television (and almost never watches much there, very annoying) but, I have gotten him to change his buying habits, and he doesnt buy off amazon no where near what he used to, its like once a year now. Ive have been successful in teaching him to at least think about where he spends money, and who it supports. It took some time sure.