Please name just one long term storage for highly radioactive waste. While you will fail at that, a second task: try to imagine a facility, that is able to store something safely for 1 Million years. If you can, you are not trying hard enough.
Dude, scroll up! I literally started all this by giving you a video about one! You’re ignorant ass assuming you’re right, and ignoring what is already provided, doesn’t mean that you’re actually correct.
try to imagine a facility, that is able to store something safely for 1 Million years. If you can, you are not trying hard enough.
The earth has already literally been doing this. There’s tons of radioactive material under the ground. In fact, there’s literally a naturally occurring nuclear reactor that is safe underground. Here’s an article that gives some visual representation of all the nuclear waste, and how little volume it takes up. It’s just a matter of logistics to get it underground. In Finland, that’s not too hard, because it’s small. The US had plans for a solution, but it was logistically challenging to transport it all to one site from all over the US. Local storage makes more sense, and there’s plenty of ways to do it. However, the casks are perfectly safe and there’s no rush for a permanent solution for a few centuries probably, at this rate.
You can’t even name one, you just link to a bad researched video.
How do you know there isn’t an ice age in 100.000 years that completly changes the geological structure at those chosen points?
How do you know their copper tanks will last as long as calculated?
It is a silly long time you want to store highly radioactive material and you have to garantee that it won’t touch any water sources. That is impossible to proove - everything else is wishfull thinking or targeted propaganda.
How do you know there isn’t an ice age in 100.000 years that completly changes the geological structure at those chosen points?
Who cares? So what, the mine collapses and we can’t get to the waste. Why would that matter?
How do you know their copper tanks will last as long as calculated?
They’re checked to make sure things are holding up, so who cares? If there’s an issue then we’ll know about it. If it’s in long-term storage then it literally does not matter. The ground is shielding everything. There’s radioactive rock all over in the ground.
Being next to the fuel rods is a bad idea. That’s not where or how they’re being stored.
However, I’m not scared of a little radiation. If you are, then don’t go outside and live in a lead bubble. I’m not trying to be irradiated, but I don’t have some paralyzing fear of it. We adapted to live in a world with constant low-level ionizing radiation. It’s only dangerous at high levels it seems. The linear no-threshold model is outdated and doesn’t represent reality.
Also, I like that I named the facility and now you’re just ignoring that. Do you recognize that it’s a thing now?
Please name just one long term storage for highly radioactive waste. While you will fail at that, a second task: try to imagine a facility, that is able to store something safely for 1 Million years. If you can, you are not trying hard enough.
Dude, scroll up! I literally started all this by giving you a video about one! You’re ignorant ass assuming you’re right, and ignoring what is already provided, doesn’t mean that you’re actually correct.
The earth has already literally been doing this. There’s tons of radioactive material under the ground. In fact, there’s literally a naturally occurring nuclear reactor that is safe underground. Here’s an article that gives some visual representation of all the nuclear waste, and how little volume it takes up. It’s just a matter of logistics to get it underground. In Finland, that’s not too hard, because it’s small. The US had plans for a solution, but it was logistically challenging to transport it all to one site from all over the US. Local storage makes more sense, and there’s plenty of ways to do it. However, the casks are perfectly safe and there’s no rush for a permanent solution for a few centuries probably, at this rate.
You can’t even name one, you just link to a bad researched video.
How do you know there isn’t an ice age in 100.000 years that completly changes the geological structure at those chosen points?
How do you know their copper tanks will last as long as calculated?
It is a silly long time you want to store highly radioactive material and you have to garantee that it won’t touch any water sources. That is impossible to proove - everything else is wishfull thinking or targeted propaganda.
Ok, the name is Onkalo spent nuclear fuel repository. Is that better? I named it. Now shut the fuck up.
Who cares? So what, the mine collapses and we can’t get to the waste. Why would that matter?
They’re checked to make sure things are holding up, so who cares? If there’s an issue then we’ll know about it. If it’s in long-term storage then it literally does not matter. The ground is shielding everything. There’s radioactive rock all over in the ground.
The fear of radiation is the targeted propaganda. It isn’t an issue. We deal with radiation all the time. Our bodies are adapted to fix radiation damage. In fact, there’s growing evidence that a little more radiation is actually beneficial, not that a nuclear plant is going to increase your radiation exposure or anything.
Oh wow. That is next level. If someone builds a sauna out of fuel rods, do yourself a favour and don’t go in there.
Being next to the fuel rods is a bad idea. That’s not where or how they’re being stored.
However, I’m not scared of a little radiation. If you are, then don’t go outside and live in a lead bubble. I’m not trying to be irradiated, but I don’t have some paralyzing fear of it. We adapted to live in a world with constant low-level ionizing radiation. It’s only dangerous at high levels it seems. The linear no-threshold model is outdated and doesn’t represent reality.
Also, I like that I named the facility and now you’re just ignoring that. Do you recognize that it’s a thing now?