• ccunix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Unfortunately, thanks to the anti-nuclear lobby, we are in a situation where the current reactors will have to be shutdown before the new ones are available to take their place.

    • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, the famous french anti-nuclear lobby. Those guys who control the french government with its nuclear weapons, who has also recently built a nuclear reactor. That government totally is controlled by the anti-nuclear lobby.

      Or … maybe France tried upgrading its aging nuclear reactors with the new reactor in Flamanville, which went spectacular over budget? And debt ridden EdF simply has not the funds to build over 50 new reactors at 13 billion each?

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Because it only replaces a environmental disaster with a future one. Still no (practical) way to handle the waste.

      • アイス@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Still no (practical) way to handle the waste.

        That is false. See my other comment here.

        The actual problem is a lack of education amongst the populace combined with a huge surplus of lobbying and a dash of politics.