• Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    They are the options though, he can then share his if he wants which others have done or mandate a minimum or something but that is for unions to do.

    I absolutely could, the alternarive being for neither to have it and it be shared.

    • gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I think that’s narrow-minded but maybe I’m being naive. As neither one of us are in that position we can only continue to speculate. But until major actor throws their weight behind a union they are effectively a part of the owner class. You can’t have 100 million dollars and not be a part of the owning class, at some point you stop being a worker and I think that amount is when you no longer have to work while still having a good life (like 5 mil). If the options were keep it or lose it to the owners, you’re right keeping it is the better option.