• Nerdulous@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    60 minutes ago

    At least Dad got to touch something for his money. NFTs don’t even deliver on their sole mission statement

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      45 minutes ago

      What was their mission statement? Here’s a picture that you own the copyright of? I don’t see how they could ever make sense unless they were legitimately fabulous images that people loved and wanted to buy prints of

      • Nerdulous@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        35 minutes ago

        To own a digital asset that only had one original. Something that could have an identifiable, singular owner despite being a digital asset. Problem is no one gives a shit if you’re the original, provable “owner” of a jpg someone else made. Which makes these worthless to all but idiots who fell for it.