• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s coincidental with the human adoption of farming. We changed the food source people have, and that impacted brain and body development. We absolutely see this modern day with malnutrition.

    • solo@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s coincidental with the human adoption of farming.

      So far it looks like no hypothesis holds water. For example this one about farming is talking about a timeframe of 10.000 years. The shrinkage started 100.000. So there is a 90.000 years gap, that is left unexplained

        • solo@piefed.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yes, DeSilva published the 2021 paper you linked. In 2022 he got criticism from Villmoare and Grabowski (see: Did the transition to complex societies in the Holocene drive a reduction in brain size? A reassessment of the DeSilva et al. (2021) hypothesis). Then in 2023 DeSilva revised his argument in (link above, in the description), extending the date back, still not giving anwers about the shrinkage observed since 100.000 years ago.

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Then in 2023 DeSilva revised his argument in (link above, in the description), extending the date back, still not giving anwers about the shrinkage observed since 100.000 years ago.

            yeah, from the last 3,000 to within the last 10,000 years, with the sharp decline ~5,000 years ago… which does line up with widespread adoption of agriculture still.

            • solo@piefed.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Of course you can choose to believe what you want.

              The point I was trying to make is that there is no scientific consensus on the topic about how global the decline was, when it began and why it happened - as well as if it is related to the formation of complex societies, farming, language, dietary changes, temperature, or body size.

              • jet@hackertalks.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                there is no scientific consensus on the topic

                Agreed. That is why we are here speculating.

                when it began and why it happened

                This is what makes it a super interesting topic!