• real_squids@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Worse, damage to private property 😱

      The suspect was “strongly suspected of jointly causing explosions, anti-constitutional sabotage, and destruction of buildings and structures,” the prosecutors’ statement said.

      Also today I found out there is constitutional sabotage. ig applies in times of war?

      • dracc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Can’t be. Russia-Ukraine war started in 2014 so this so-called constitutional sabotage must be something else. Or does the Germans who decided to prop up the Russian war machine through Nordstream somehow thinks it’s their pipeline, on international waters?

        • Lupus108@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Initial planning of Nordstream 1 started in 1995, building started 2010 and was finalized 2012. Nordstream 2 on the other hand was planned 2013, although building started 2018 so well into the war, but was stopped by US sanctions in 2019. Nordstream 1 was a project to connect the Russian federation closer to Europe, at that time a reasonable project (although still fucking greedy) Nordstream 2 is a different story propelled by greed and disregard for Russian crimes.

          Just trying to point out the nuances in German/Russian relations during the last 30.years.

        • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Or does the Germans who decided to prop up the Russian war machine through Nordstream

          Dingdingding!

          Germany cares more about its economy than the people dying for its proxy war

    • x1gma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Whether you like it or not, for the sabotage of public and critical infrastructure. When the initial suspect was Russia for no reason, people wanted to call in Article 5, now it’s fine, because the “good guys” did it?

      Justice for all.

      • dracc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Who wanted to Article 5 it? I sure didn’t.

        I was merely a child back in -95 but I’ve always thought the Nordstream project(s) were ideologically despicable since I first heard about them some 20 years ago.

        Edit: how someone allegedly thought Russia would’ve done this to themselves sure baffles me too.