• Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    52 minutes ago

    In a way, as a Canadian, I’m glad for Trump for two reasons. One, we hated him so much that the conservative candidate in our federal election lost what should have been the easiest conservative win of my lifetime because he threw in support behind trump. And two, we are finally diversifying our economy away from that volatile ass country.

    • Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      By playing checkers against your opponent and scamming as much money as possible from your pawns?

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Walmart is currently deep-sixing a whole bunch of Canadian products that are subject to tariffs. that doesn’t really sound like a Canadian win to me. That doesn’t bring me joy, but let’s not be delusional here.

    • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Carney was right to walk away, but the retaliatory tariffs are just going to further punish Canadians on top of this.

      Times are about to get really tight.

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        What part of the image in the OP did you not understand. It’s trying to paint the whole thing as nothing but a win for Canada.

  • Malyca@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 hours ago

    That’s what I would do if I where there. I’m in the Pacific Northwest and we feel the tourism squeeze here. I don’t care. You can’t insult your closest friend and bully them. I want the US to suffer the consequences, for a good amount of time, so every idiot is aware of the reasons for their pain. Not to mention Canada is beautiful. I could vacation at Banff or even in the far east for the rest of my life and be fine, you guys will be fine and even happier spending money to support your own countrymen.

  • imvii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Can we do export tariffs on potash now? I think an extra 30% is reasonable.

  • Talaraine@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’m an American who didn’t vote for trump and none of this is my fault…but fuck it make it hurt harder daddy, we deserve it uwu

  • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Well, most Canadians. I gotta say, maybe not surprised, but definitely irked that Carney is trying to encourage Canadians to put US liquor back on the shelves.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I think he’s trying to encourage the premiers to allow US brands back onto the store shelves.

      If that were enough to make a deal, it wouldn’t be awful. I think a lot of Canadians wouldn’t buy the liquor if it was back on store shelves, so it might not change much.

      It could be a good negotiating tactic, because the Americans might think that it meant that the revenue for US alcohol companies might start flowing again, when in reality it just puts it directly in the hands of Canadian buyers, rather than in the hands of the Premiers.

      What’s more annoying to me is that Carney is going to go with counter-tariffs. That just means that if Canadians choose to buy American products they have to pay more. And, since the US is so monstrously huge, in many cases there aren’t alternatives to American products.

      What I think they should be doing instead is investigating American companies for antitrust, allowing Canadians to circumvent DRM to do things like install alternative app stores to deprive Apple / Google of revenue, allow Canadians to work around printer ink restrictions to use any ink they want, allow Canadian farmers to repair their own tractors without John Deere’s approval, etc.

      Instead of raising Canadians’ costs, deprive American companies of the unfair IP rules that they use to make massive profits. Those rules were forced on Canada in exchange for the US agreeing to barrier-free access to the American market for Canada. If the US is withdrawing from their own trade deals, then Canada shouldn’t feel obliged to uphold its obligations under those deals either.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 hours ago

      That was always a bargaining chip. It wasn’t super significant from an economic standpoint, but it’s an easy thing to remove liquor from the shelves, just a decision by Premiers. Liquor producers have way more influence in the US relative to the actual economic impact. That makes a very good bargaining chip. Don’t know why you’d be upset over Carney wanting to use that bargaining chip.

      It’s a moot point now, pretty sure US booze isn’t going back on the shelves anytime soon after the collapse of trade talks.