Unusual request, so let me be straight about what it is before I ask for anything.

The short version: I pay for MLB.tv, but the league geo-restricts games depending on the IP you watch from. The one setup that unlocks every game (no local blackouts, and none of the “this game is a Netflix/Roku/Peacock exclusive” carve-outs) is MLB.tv International, which needs a UK or EU IP. I’ve built a small Raspberry Pi that lets my stream appear to originate from a home internet connection over there, and I’m looking for someone willing to plug one into a spare ethernet port and forget it exists.

The honest part: this works around MLB’s geo-restrictions, which is against their terms of service. I’m doing it with a fully paid subscription to watch games I’ve already paid for, but if that’s not something you want on your connection, totally fair, no hard feelings, stop reading here. I’d rather you pass than feel misled.

Still with me? Here’s everything.

First, the thing you actually care about: it barely touches your connection

It is NOT a 24/7 relay, and it does NOT stream whole games through your line. MLB only checks your location at the moment a stream starts. So my usage is:

  • I switch it on only at game time, for a game I’m actually blocked from.
  • The stream starts, the check passes, and after under ~5 minutes I switch it back off
  • The game then keeps playing over my own connection, not yours.

Net effect on you: a WireGuard handshake and a few minutes of video per game I watch. A few MB, not hours. I use a Home Assistant script to enable/disable the VPN Client in UniFi, so it’s guaranteed to shut off after a few minutes. No accidentally leaving it on forever and using your connection

Why a residential UK/EU IP, specifically

I’ve already done the homework, and residential is the only door left open:

  • I already run this through a family member’s connection in the US, and it works flawlessly. But a US IP still leaves me blocked from national-broadcast games (the ESPN/Fox/Peacock/Apple/Netflix exclusives), because those are carved out of US MLB.tv at the product level no US IP fixes them. MLB.tv International has no such carve-outs, hence UK/EU.
  • Commercial VPNs are blocked. I tried Mullvad, Proton, Nord and others… MLB blocks their IP ranges outright; streams fail to start.
  • Datacenter/VPS IPs are blocked too. Hetzner, OVH, etc… same story, flagged as non-residential and refused.

A real residential connection is the only thing MLB treats as a legitimate viewer. That’s why I need a person with a spare port, not a server I can rent.

How it works (the technical bit)

  • The Pi runs WireGuard, dialing outbound to a small cloud relay I rent (it never listens for inbound, so your router never needs to forward a port to it).
  • It also runs Tailscale as an independent, outbound-only management door, so I can maintain it without ever asking you to touch it.
  • The OS is a hardened Raspberry Pi: deny-all-inbound firewall, key-only SSH, no passwords over the wire, automatic security updates, and self-healing tunnel watchdogs.
   [ my home, Starlink / CGNat ]  
          │   WireGuard  (encrypted, outbound)  
          ▼  
   [ small VPS I rent ]   ◀─ only forwards encrypted frames; sees nothing  
          │   WireGuard  (encrypted)  
          ▼  
   [ My Pi in your home ]   ── dials OUT only, never listens; firewall blocks your LAN entirely  
          │  
          ▼  
   [ your home internet ]  ──▶  MLB.tv  (only ever sees your residential UK/EU IP)  

   ( my paid stream flows back up the same path to my TV — I switch the tunnel  
     off after the first few minutes, so most of it never crosses your line )  

What I’d send, and what you’d do

A Raspberry Pi in a small case. You give it power (~3–5 W, ~£0.50/month of electricity) and one ethernet port. That’s the entire job… no router config, no port forwarding, no software on your devices, no accounts.

What it can’t do on your network

The firewall denies all inbound, and for forwarded traffic it drops every private-network destination before allowing anything out. In plain terms: traffic from my tunnel physically cannot reach your LAN… not your PCs, NAS, printer, or router admin page. It can only reach the public internet.

Two things make trusting me cheap:

  • Put it on a guest/IoT VLAN if you have one. Isolating it costs it nothing and then the guarantee above is enforced by your gear, not my word.
  • Unplug it whenever. Nothing on your end depends on it.

Trust but verify

Send me your SSH public key and I’ll set you up a read-only account. One command, sudo host-verify, prints the live firewall rules, the tunnel status, and every connection the box currently has open — so you can confirm all of the above any time. That account can’t change anything or reach the rest of the box; it’s there purely so you don’t have to trust me blind. Happy to walk through the whole config with you too.

What’s in it for you

Mostly my genuine gratitude willingness to reciprocate in kind: host something for you, help on a homelab project, or whatever feels fair.

If you’re in the UK or EU and up for it (or just have questions) reply or DM. Cheers, and thanks for reading either way.

  • BuckFutter@timeyak.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I can’t help, but commenting for visibility because I think this is clever. Cheers and good luck!

        • Hasnep@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          16 hours ago

          The give aways: starting paragraphs with a punchy sentence in bold with a colon.

          Plus they used the “it’s not X it’s Y” thing.

          • Glowstick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Some people write that way, especially when they’re trying to talk about a complex topic. In fact that’s exactly the reason why some ai has that style, because it was trained on billions of pieces of human writing and that’s the style some people write in.

          • essell@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Could just be autism. They overlap in style a lot, especially when making a request like this. A real possibility in this community

              • essell@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                15 hours ago

                It totally can through.

                When making a request, and generally expecting to be misunderstood, autism can lead to over explaining and very logical detailed expression like this.

                I was moderately effective as a salesman with this approach, with some limitations and caveats.

          • one_old_coder@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Also the bold text and headers (h1, h2 in HTML). No one does this on purpose, even more if it’s for pirating TV.

          • Ooops@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing

            That’s the probably most unhelpful and stupid thing I saw in quite some time. The AI or Not Quiz right at the beginning in particular regularly links the exact same things to human or to AI (404 links are a sign or AI hallucination or just natural link decay that show it’s from a human; wonky grammar is a sign for AI unless the text is human-written where it’s just bad english that LLMs would not produce intentionally…).

            Yes, spotting AI by clear attributes isn’t easy. If it was those points would be changed first in training of AI. But lengthily discussing tell–tale signs then interpreting them in contrary ways depending on source is absolute bullshit.

      • Glowstick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I don’t see a reason to assume that, but even if it was there’s certainly no reason to think that it was used as anything other than a writing aid for what OP was trying to communicate.

        • magnue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Yes but it definitely detracts from it being clever, and puts it more into the category of potential scam.