• blackjam_alex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This comic is so old that at some point someone added Rage Comic faces on top of it, and that on itself must had happened more than 15 years ago.

    • blackjam_alex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      And ofc after that someone sloppified the Rage Comic version. You see the modified versions more often than the original.

  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    In ancient times, 2010, I actually bought Winrar. I wanted to support the developer. Even back then as a child, I found it so cool that someone would give me a very useful tool like this for free, with an infinite free trial. And then I found out about FOSS, after that my mind was blown.

  • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Do people even still need to use WinRAR? I mean, the rar format isn’t even that prevalent anymore, not even for piracy stuff…

    It was useful 20 years ago, but like, most OS have native support for it now, making it even further useless to download a WinRAR.

    • SolSerkonos@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      It’s what I used for an extremely long time, so i just sort of… kept using it. I’ve only recently swapped to 7-Zip. I think the only feature it has that 7-Zip doesn’t is making part files? But I could be wrong.

      • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 minutes ago

        part files is what made WinRAR so popular with the piracy community. Especially back in the before times, when you were direct downloading and an internect hiccup would cause a download to fail/restart. Being able to download a thing in smaller parts, only having to restart smaller chunks instead of the whole, and then assembling the whole build as one… that’s what made WinRAR useful…

        Compression was nice and all too, but self executing part assembly was the standout feature. Again, rendered useless when download managers are built into modern broswers. You can retry a direct download without having to restart the whole file.

      • WakeUpSmashPots@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Literally the only reason WinRAR had ever been used is because people either didn’t know about 7zip, or their parents dropped them on their heads causing them to “prefer WinRAR” 🤮

        • arudesalad@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I’ve always used 7zip but whenever I help a friend with tech stuff and they have winrar I find that its ui is better for browsing archives without extracting it (from what I remember, I haven’t used windows 7zip for a year now and on linux I just use ark)

          • WakeUpSmashPots@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            25 minutes ago

            7zip’s UI is fine, it’s just basic and doesn’t look as nice, but why would it need to? It’s UI definitely doesn’t make it difficult to use.

            7zip is not only free, but it doesn’t ask you for money at all, it just works, and it supports extracting RAR files as well. It is true that WinRAR technically USED to be better, when 7zip was still fairly new, but literally the only reason anyone still prefers it today is nostalgia.

  • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    After using winrar for years (after using rar years before that… not sure if it’s the same company), I finally bought to copies a few years back. One for myself, one as a Christmas gift to a friend.