• Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 小時前

    I guess what I don’t understand is how the candidates in the general election can be so unpalatable if the primaries are the place where people can ask for what they really want.

    • dubs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 小時前

      Because the Democrats spend more time fighting leftists, then they do fighting the Republicans. Check out the recent DSA elections: Democrats spent a bunch of time and energy fighting against them.

      Additionally, the Democrats fight tooth and nail to keep third parties off of the ballots. They also spend a bunch of effort saying that things like “not bombing kids” or “medicare for all” are unreasonable, or unrealistic, to keep people from thinking that 3rd parties are viable.

      • Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 小時前

        I can see why my wording was confusing when taken out of context. If you go up a few levels you can see that we are saying the same thing. Or at least I think?

        I asked when do people get to push back against the lesser evil, and someone said the primaries. What you were responding to here was me saying I don’t see how that’s possibly true if the primaries keep spitting out people who have no interest in being even slightly less evil.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 小時前

      A lot of people like liberal candidates over leftist ones, and some vote for liberals in the primaries because they think a leftist would lose the general (voicing your true opinions is safer, but is only truly safe if your party’s voters would vote for any candidate who wins your primary).