facts are uncivil now?

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?

idk, lemmy.ml mod account

  1. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?

community ban, removed comments

  1. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).

above

  1. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).

above

  1. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

it’s just pointing out that the soviet union was not a perfectly fair socialist democracy as they think it was, I’d appreciate an unban

  • Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 day ago

    .ml is run by tankies; any criticism of the Soviet Union isn’t going to be met positively.

    • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s plenty of criticism there, although there are also some total Glazers.

      What they don’t allow is thoughtless extreme criticism that isn’t based on the material world. In that very thread there are people talking about how the soviet Union declined in its later years.

      If you got to lemmy.ml and make some post about the failures of leadership leading to recriminalising lgbt love and culture people will willingly discuss it. Or how there were flaws in their women’s lib attempts that lead to pay disparities and so on.

      What they tend to ban is stuff like this where someone just says “instance of terrible thing, therefore whole project bad and doomed” which is a ridiculous and frustrating way to analyse anything.

      • punkisundead [they/them]@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        21 hours ago

        If you got to lemmy.ml and make some post about the failures of leadership leading to recriminalising lgbt love and culture people will willingly discuss it. Or how there were flaws in their women’s lib attempts that lead to pay disparities and so on.

        Not really my experience. I think its up to the mods mood that day or if they read you as “a good socialist” thats allowed to have critiques or as a “bad socialist” that somehow isnt allowed to have critiques.

        • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          To a certain extent I agree that you have to consider the source. Someone saying “NYT sucks” means something very different when it comes from a leftist or a magat. But yeah, tankies in general are annoying. Most of them won’t even admit NK is terrible, and believing that means you’re corrupted by western propaganda. Still waiting for one of them to move to such a glorious paradise country…