facts are uncivil now?

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?

idk, lemmy.ml mod account

  1. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?

community ban, removed comments

  1. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).

above

  1. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).

above

  1. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

it’s just pointing out that the soviet union was not a perfectly fair socialist democracy as they think it was, I’d appreciate an unban

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    18 hours ago

    When someone tries the sealioning trick, the correct response is always - “I think this would be more productive if you elucidate on why you feel this point needs further exploration.”

    We had an academic who spent a lot of time sealioning in our department; this is how we dealt with him.

    • sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Maybe. At that point I’m usually just no longer interested in interacting. I suppose in academics it makes sense but I find any sort of competitive discussion on internet pretty pathetic. Especially when it’s about things like personally held beliefs, which is kind of a weird currency to be making bets with. And usually you’re not going to convince a random internet person to respect anything they don’t already hold by default because they are playing out a personal fantasy of some kind. “Changing my mind when presented with compelling info” isn’t really a fantasy master-debate bros really have.

      Obviously there’s exceptions but most people aren’t online doing this “joust with me in front of a crowd” bit because they have the social skills to interact with strangers irl.