The vote was 212-206. All but one Democrat voted against it, as openness within the party to expand the high court by four seats grows.
The joint resolution, offered by Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., calls for amending the Constitution to say: “The Supreme Court of the United States shall be composed of nine justices consisting of one chief justice and eight associate justices.”
The office of House Minority Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass., encouraged lawmakers to vote “no,” saying the amendment would take away a power intended for Congress and do nothing to address the “affordability crisis” under President Donald Trump.
“This proposed constitutional amendment would permanently fix the number of Supreme Court justices at nine, stripping Congress of yet another constitutional authority that is meant to be controlled by the American people’s representatives,” Clark’s office wrote to lawmakers Wednesday ahead of the vote
Term limits require an amendment, which is impossible in the current national climate. Expanding the court is just passing a law. So, win both chambers, eliminate the filibuster and expand the court to 15 seats. Maybe increase the House to over 1,000 members while you’re at it — effectively destroying any issues with the Electoral college and somewhat with gerrymandering.
Expand the court and remove the Permanent Apportionment act of 1929 that makes the House a defacto second Senate and disenfranchises a majority of the country. That artificially low limit of 435 across 300+ million people (based on nothing but the fact that’s how many House members there were at the time) is what makes gerrymandering so effective.
The House should have roughly 1500 members to have effective representation. That’s one representative per roughly 200k people. At the moment we’re at 670k average per representative, and that’s not at all consistent across the country.