• Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      15 hours ago

      And you just blindly trust the statement of a single person (who really doesn’t look perfectly trustworthy) to the point you frame the other person as a monster without good evidence. Now who’s acting “a bit rich”?

      My god, what a load of bullshit this whole post is. This is some “frontpage of a magazine at the kiosk no one with half a brain should ever buy” stuff.

      • stenAanden@feddit.dkOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        No. I have actually examined the case and realized that Amber Heard is innocent and Depp is a rapist.

    • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 hours ago

      No, trusting the legal system would be reading “guilty” and stopping there.

      I have seen more than 200h of motions and trial live. I have also seen independent opinions. I have seen evidence. I have seen articles corroborating my conclusions. And ultimately I also have trust in the judge as well as the jurors who delivered this verdict (I think they were individually polled but I’m not sure).

      Rich would be to have such a minority opinion that you hold and asserting everyone should think like you.

      I don’t, I think it’s good that there’s other opinions than mine. Doesn’t mean I have to agree. But such is nuance.