elonmuskszahnbuerste@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 天前If a Tesla Cybercab fleet were profitable, Tesla wouldn't sell you oneelectrek.coexternal-linkmessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1417
arrow-up1417external-linkIf a Tesla Cybercab fleet were profitable, Tesla wouldn't sell you oneelectrek.coelonmuskszahnbuerste@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 天前message-square49fedilink
minus-squarepivot_root@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 天前 This is most likely just a way to offload liability And to make the owners pay for maintenance and electricity. If they lock the feature behind a higher price tier, a subscription, or a cut of the profits, it’s a low-risk income stream with minimal expenses.
minus-squareartyom@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 天前 And to make the owners pay for…electricity. Tesla is an electric utility, they could probably make more money providing it to themselves.
minus-squareboonhet@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 天前Doubt it would be more. Electricity is going up in the US. Selling is more profitable right now
minus-squareartyom@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 天前I mean as a utility provider, selling more electricity is usually a good thing…
And to make the owners pay for maintenance and electricity.
If they lock the feature behind a higher price tier, a subscription, or a cut of the profits, it’s a low-risk income stream with minimal expenses.
Tesla is an electric utility, they could probably make more money providing it to themselves.
Doubt it would be more. Electricity is going up in the US. Selling is more profitable right now
I mean as a utility provider, selling more electricity is usually a good thing…