I almost clicked it too. There has to be a better way than having to be constantly vigilant against being duped into “consenting” to be spied upon. The internet doesn’t have to suck like this.

  • Salvo@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    19 hours ago

    This is by design. They don’t want anyone to restrict access so they have their desired option; A) on the RH side (to conform to the western idiom that right is forward, based on the flow of text). B) less text, this is also why “OK” is shorter than “Cancel”

    You will also notice that there are no icons. Several OS’s HIGs recommend a ✅ for “confirm” and a ❌ for “reject” because they are easier to interpret quickly. Nowadays human interface design is all about forcing the user to conform, rather than allowing them make a decision that isn’t preferable to the developer.

    This is the whole underpinning of Neo-Liberalism, give the users multiple irrelevant choices, but don’t give them any meaningful choice.

    • queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      100% intentional. This is just one example of the rather dramatically named dark patterns. As the corporate internet inevitably slides into the maximization funnel, dark patterns get ever more intrusive and worse for users. Corporations that don’t, or can’t, maximally leverage dark patterns generate less revenue, sicken, and are eventually eaten by a larger, stronger corporation.

      Addendum: I presume someone who knows what an OS’s HIG’s are probably also knows what dark patterns are called. I wrote this more for the general audience than to try and explain it to you, and it occurs to me that it reads more like the latter and may come off as condescending or know-it-all-ish. If so I am sorry, sounding condescending is a trait in my writing I’m trying to be more conscious about.