Valid point . He may have started the foundation in his parents name. It’s doesn’t say that but it’s possible. I’ve never read the comics but in the movies his parents built the train and other public works. I think it was thier foundation not Batman’s but there’s no way I can be sure.
I know the comics are very different. In the movies Bruce does the opposite of being a charitable. He has a persona of being a rich entitled jerk to hide the fact he’s Batman. The love interest even points that out with “it’s what you do that defines you” when he tries to explain it’s an act.
I also hear in the comic he does more detective type stuff which is better than the movies where he just assumes the people he’s fighting are bad, which they are in the movies but he has no proof of that, he’s just assuming.
It sounds like in the comics he’s far more responsible. Even so I think he should stick to the charity work. And Gotham is so bad that only a vigilante can save them and that vigalante just hands them over to an “open door” prison. If that’s really the best that can be done in that cursed city… level the city and leave. Fist fighting will never work because there’s a revolving door of evil.
But then again one of my most controversial life views is often “blow the whole thing up” I say that for a lot lol. Like Israel/palenstien. It’s been constant war for thousands of years years. Christian crusades, Muslim crusades, Jewish war crimes. Fuck it. Blow the whole area up so no one can have it anymore. Evacuate it first obviously, then blow it up. Save a lot of lives that way.
But I’m not a Batman, for good reason. I shouldn’t be in charge of those decisions and neither should Bruce.
Valid point . He may have started the foundation in his parents name. It’s doesn’t say that but it’s possible. I’ve never read the comics but in the movies his parents built the train and other public works. I think it was thier foundation not Batman’s but there’s no way I can be sure.
I know the comics are very different. In the movies Bruce does the opposite of being a charitable. He has a persona of being a rich entitled jerk to hide the fact he’s Batman. The love interest even points that out with “it’s what you do that defines you” when he tries to explain it’s an act.
I also hear in the comic he does more detective type stuff which is better than the movies where he just assumes the people he’s fighting are bad, which they are in the movies but he has no proof of that, he’s just assuming.
It sounds like in the comics he’s far more responsible. Even so I think he should stick to the charity work. And Gotham is so bad that only a vigilante can save them and that vigalante just hands them over to an “open door” prison. If that’s really the best that can be done in that cursed city… level the city and leave. Fist fighting will never work because there’s a revolving door of evil.
But then again one of my most controversial life views is often “blow the whole thing up” I say that for a lot lol. Like Israel/palenstien. It’s been constant war for thousands of years years. Christian crusades, Muslim crusades, Jewish war crimes. Fuck it. Blow the whole area up so no one can have it anymore. Evacuate it first obviously, then blow it up. Save a lot of lives that way.
But I’m not a Batman, for good reason. I shouldn’t be in charge of those decisions and neither should Bruce.