• python@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    27 days ago

    Already joined the list for the 1TB model! 1.2k€ isn’t too bad imo, I was expecting to pay like 1.5k

    • TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      27 days ago

      I’m debating. This is one thing I’ve been really excited about for a while but I’m not sure the 1TB is worth the extra $300. But I waaaaant it!!!

      Its so sad that AI is taking all of the fabrication time.

      • python@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        27 days ago

        Realistically, it probably isn’t worth it because you can expand the storage via SD Card either way (and it’s a lot cheaper, especially if you already have a good SD Card at home). But “I want it tho” is my reason for getting the bigger one too, so just follow your heart 🥹

        • undefinedTruth@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          27 days ago

          Also, if your PC is more powerful than this you are most likely be streaming instead of using it in standalone mode.

        • jlow@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          27 days ago

          Is an SD card going to have the same performance (and longevity?) as an SSD? Back when I was using a Raspberry Pi people always said it was kinda risky running the OS on an SD card.

          • python@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            27 days ago

            You’d still be running the OS on the SSD (the smaller one is 256GB, that’s still plenty of space). As for whether SD Cards are worse, I have no idea :0 I know I’m running most of my Switch games off an SD Card and never noticed any performance issues, but Switch games really aren’t demanding enough to be a good benchmark I guess

            • iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              26 days ago

              On a Steam Deck, it is noticeable. Some blame the SD reader itself, which might not give the best speeds, but there’s a noticeable difference between a very expensive very fast SD, and the still faster internal storage. Load times on heavy games groom the SD can be… Long.

              • python@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                26 days ago

                Oh, interesting! Is it just the initial load times, or is there noticeable lag? Because the former might be fine, but the latter would be a total motion sickness nightmare in VR

                • iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  26 days ago

                  I mean, I’m talking on my experience on the Steam Deck, but I think it still might apply. Load times are slower in general. I reckon if a game streams assets on the fly heavily (a GTA-like game, a heavy open world game), that might put it to the test. But I haven’t had cases where it just struggles to keep the game flow because of storage streaming speed. It’s just…you feel it installing and handling big file chunks is a slower process in general.