This is going to be a fun one.

So here are the facts:

I commented on a news article about a mother and adult son charged with incest (and adultery as well for her.) This is what I said:

Someone responded to me and I replied before I realized my original comment was removed for being inappropriate. Then I added the edit when I saw.

The next day I discovered I’d been banned from that community for “pro-incest comments” and several others I don’t think I’ve ever been in for rule 4 violations. The orignal post was removed.

You can see those here:

Site rule 4 is: Usernames or posts/comments containing transphobia, homophobia, sexism, racism, ableism, zionism, anti-veganism, or trivializing COVID. No self-described or obvious fascists, conservatives, or reactionaries.

My comments had none of those things. I’d even go so far as to say my banning was reactionary.

Now, I’m not defending incest, especially not for myself. My problem is with puritanical laws interfering with the private sex lives of people. In my original comment I stated that grooming was a separate issue and should be dealt with, but that there is nothing inherently wrong with incest. That is, enthusiastic consensual sex between capable adults.

I know someone will bring up the Hapsburgs, so yes, children of incest should be avoided.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    19 days ago

    I do not think that would be a power dynamic problem

    whew, well, lets all be glad youre not a clinical psychologist who actually understands these things

    and attempting to defend this shit? thats pretty sick… what is your motivation here?

    • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 days ago

      It’s just my opinion about that specific situation little lucifer. I, as an adult, would not let myself get groomed by an adult. Guess it doesn’t apply to everyone