You keep trying to change the subject, you jump from discussion to discussion. Why? And you become increasingly aggressive. Consider stepping away from the keyboard for a while.
What are you, 15?
That seems like it would reflect poorly upon you, since a teenager would then be running circles around you.
There is nothing bad faith or bait about “don’t vote for genociders.” It is a genuine request, please do not continue giving power to genociders. As opposed to your question about having nothing available, which is pretty clearly a disingenuous question. Had it been sincere then you would have taken the time to give context to explain how nothing is available to you and explained what kind of work you think you would like to do and ask for help with first steps in getting into organising. You didn’t do any of these things because your question was not genuine, so you did not consider how a person asking such a thing would actually approach the dilemma.
Kind of hard when you won’t answer my question. I figure you speak of candidates representing the democrats and republicans due to your use of “viable” and I figure you’re a genocide denier due to the quoted text, which makes it seem like you’re saying the democrats (unless of course you’re a republican) aren’t responsible for the genocide in Gaza.
I know it’s comfortable for you types to play obtuse and have to be dragged kicking and screaming to every conclusion, but that does not make for useful discussion.
You keep trying to change the subject, you jump from discussion to discussion. Why? And you become increasingly aggressive. Consider stepping away from the keyboard for a while.
That seems like it would reflect poorly upon you, since a teenager would then be running circles around you.
There is nothing bad faith or bait about “don’t vote for genociders.” It is a genuine request, please do not continue giving power to genociders. As opposed to your question about having nothing available, which is pretty clearly a disingenuous question. Had it been sincere then you would have taken the time to give context to explain how nothing is available to you and explained what kind of work you think you would like to do and ask for help with first steps in getting into organising. You didn’t do any of these things because your question was not genuine, so you did not consider how a person asking such a thing would actually approach the dilemma.
Because there’s no viable candidate that you don’t consider a genicider, whether they are or not, which gets actual genociders elected.
Oh neat! A genocide denier.
Anyway there’s actually plenty of viable canidates, you can vote for any third party not supporting israel!
Removed by mod
SUre, lets play obtuse. Don’t vote for democrats.
Removed by mod
So you don’t deny the democrats sponsored the genocide of palestinians? Insane to vote for them in that case.
Removed by mod
Kind of hard when you won’t answer my question. I figure you speak of candidates representing the democrats and republicans due to your use of “viable” and I figure you’re a genocide denier due to the quoted text, which makes it seem like you’re saying the democrats (unless of course you’re a republican) aren’t responsible for the genocide in Gaza.
I know it’s comfortable for you types to play obtuse and have to be dragged kicking and screaming to every conclusion, but that does not make for useful discussion.
Gloria LaRiva.
The Bipartodanly supported, US funded, Israeli genocide of Palestine.
You fucking ghoul.