• uszo165@futurology.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I ask the bizfolks: would YOU allow a guy in a suit with no prior engineering knowledge, but with an ai design the structural elements for a bridge for thousands of vehicles a day?

    They would allow it. The difference is that our societies decided that liability for builders of bridges is a sensible thing and nonnegotiable, but for reasons unknown to me you can release any piece of crappy software to the public without any liability whatsoever as long as you tack on it some terms and conditions that absolve you of warranty and liability. This is unthinkable with all other commodities. When it comes to software, the people in charge turn off their brains.

    • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Until they lose an astronaut or submariner who is related to a senator. Then they try to overregulate, like they did with software patents.