• Solumbran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Code under a license that you appropriate to yourself is stolen, yes, don’t play stupid.

    The typical slopbro defense of “no but it was shit ten minutes ago but now it’s amazing and perfect” is bullshit, everyone knows it, and it’s just a hypocritical loophole used to block every critic. Most of the critics on LLMs from months and years ago are still very valid, and while I try to be charitable I cannot find a scenario where this argument would be used in good faith.

    As I said, if your pong is for work, you should do your fucking work without contaminating it with slop, and if it’s not for work there’s no speed requirement. “If it works, it works” is such an absurdly moronic argument, I don’t even know where to start. Experimenting on humans is horrible, but brings advances to medicine, and “if it works, it works”. Planting evidence on someone you believe is guilty is illegal, but they end up in jail so " if it work, it works".

    I’m done, there’s no way I can delude myself any longer into thinking that slop users do it innocently, when you have such obviously shitty and worthless arguments, there’s no way you could be dumb enough to believe them. This is obviously a bunch of bad faith arguments and nothing more.

    • hyperion626@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Tell me specifically why you think a game of pong written for work with AI and vetted by a human is inferior to a game of pong written by a person if they perform indistinguishably for the person playing pong.

      • Solumbran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Because it is made through stolen data, while destroying the environment and basically the world.

        “What is the difference between a synthetic diamond and a blood diamond, if they are chemically and structurally identical in the end?”

        As I said, these arguments are so unbelievably stupid that they cannot be said in good faith, and each reply has been proving it.

        • hyperion626@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          So, your issue isn’t the AI being probably the most dangerous thing since the invention of the nuke or the quality of the response. It’s the fact they don’t have closed loop cooling, a better sources of energy, and they used data on the Internet?

          • PokerChips@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            When shit goes wrong you use ai again to band-aid and repeat and repeat until you’re at the point when you cross your fingers.

            People use ai because they don’t know how to get there which means they usually don’t really know what’s going on under the hood even if they think they understand what’s going on over the surface which means you just have slop. And then BOOM!