Well…if they have an ass I think they are more pants than chaps. Just a pretty risque design 🤷🏻 Certainly not pants I’d want to wear to a family gathering or anything.
Just always been a bit of a pet peeve of mine to call them assless, since chaps by definition don’t have an ass.
I couldn’t agree more, and I usually have the exact same thought you do. For whatever reason I took the statement literally, picturing only adding butt coverage to chaps.
All chaps are assless, otherwise they would just be pants.
Can these “pants” still have no crotch too? Non-assless chaps still seem … breezy.
Well…if they have an ass I think they are more pants than chaps. Just a pretty risque design 🤷🏻 Certainly not pants I’d want to wear to a family gathering or anything.
Just always been a bit of a pet peeve of mine to call them assless, since chaps by definition don’t have an ass.
I couldn’t agree more, and I usually have the exact same thought you do. For whatever reason I took the statement literally, picturing only adding butt coverage to chaps.
It would be weird if they gave you a donkey with every pair of chaps …