Susaga@sh.itjust.works to RPGMemes @ttrpg.networkEnglish · 4 days agoThe most convincing argumentsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square71fedilinkarrow-up137file-text
arrow-up137imageThe most convincing argumentsh.itjust.worksSusaga@sh.itjust.works to RPGMemes @ttrpg.networkEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square71fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareKichae@wanderingadventure.partylinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agophanlix@lemmy.zip Well, PF1 is. I’m not sure why so many people refuse to acknowledge PF2. It’s been out for like 7 years now. It’s like refusing to acknowledge anything past AD&D exists.
minus-squarePhanlix@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoWell I guess I’ll be a stick in the mud then. My group pretty much acted like nothing beyond 3.5 existed. We tried a 5.0 campaign… but, the loss of complexity, the lack of variety and choice in classes and prestige classes, and dozens of other issues we had kept us from having much fun with it. If PF2 is anything like DnD 5.0, hard pass.
phanlix@lemmy.zip Well, PF1 is. I’m not sure why so many people refuse to acknowledge PF2. It’s been out for like 7 years now.
It’s like refusing to acknowledge anything past AD&D exists.
Well I guess I’ll be a stick in the mud then.
My group pretty much acted like nothing beyond 3.5 existed. We tried a 5.0 campaign… but, the loss of complexity, the lack of variety and choice in classes and prestige classes, and dozens of other issues we had kept us from having much fun with it.
If PF2 is anything like DnD 5.0, hard pass.