• Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    I tried but it didn’t work. Kept getting hung up when I tired to sign in.

    Also doesn’t using AI to detect AI defeat the purpose of screening for AI?

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        So if it’s been steganographied with something the tool you use doesn’t check for, you’d never know. If someone’s post-processed the picture enough, the steganography will be destroyed and you’d never know. If the image was generated with a model that never embedded anything, you’d never know.

        So as ever, AI detectors are unreliable snake oil and should not be mentioned except to point out how unreliable they are.

      • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Hey, thanks I learned something (I think). Computer shit isn’t my area of nerdery, but from what I gather AI images gets stamped with invisible water marks and you can detect these with software (rather than AI) if that software knows what the watermark is (which is kept secret by the AI provider)

        • nialv7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          that’s exactly right! it’s kept secret because if someone figure out exactly how it’s done it becomes easy to remove. so it’s security through obscurity, but it’s what we have unfortunately. (and even today, anyone can generate images with an open-weight model, which will not have any watermarks).