libewa@feddit.org to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 23 days agoPasskeys are not a trap. Use them!hachyderm.ioexternal-linkmessage-square162fedilinkarrow-up137file-textcross-posted to: linux@lemmy.ml
arrow-up137external-linkPasskeys are not a trap. Use them!hachyderm.iolibewa@feddit.org to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 23 days agomessage-square162fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: linux@lemmy.ml
minus-squareim_fine_sandy@nord.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·22 days agoI don’t see your point I’m sorry. This would make it easier for Google to exclude small competitors.
minus-squareFerk@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-222 days agoThe point is that not all protocols are created equal. So “we shouldn’t have created HTTP” depends on what HTTP is specifying. If a protocol makes it easier for big players to abuse the system, then it’s a worse protocol in that respect. The point being made against passkeys is that, in some respects, it’s worse because of the inclusion of attestation as part of the standard.
I don’t see your point I’m sorry. This would make it easier for Google to exclude small competitors.
The point is that not all protocols are created equal. So “we shouldn’t have created HTTP” depends on what HTTP is specifying.
If a protocol makes it easier for big players to abuse the system, then it’s a worse protocol in that respect.
The point being made against passkeys is that, in some respects, it’s worse because of the inclusion of attestation as part of the standard.