• CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    If any of this shit made sense and worked like it was supposed to we wouldn’t be in this position in the first place. Seemingly the world leaders and everyone in the inner circles has completely abandoned any long term hope for their positions in the current system and are preparing for the next system. It really is true that the Earth has too many people and I think the long term planners are letting climate change happen without preparing the masses so fewer, stronger people survive. There is people planning this shit it’s not just arbitrarily short-term profits for the sake of it.

    • LettyWhiterock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The earth does not have too many people though. We are not at risk of overpopulation by any real metric.

      Resource scarcity is not a result of too many people needing not enough resources, but a result of those resources not being spread evenly. Whether because of geographical or political reasons, typically a mix of both.

      • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        It’s not about humanity it is about Earth. We aren’t meant to divide her resources to 8 billion people in any distribution. Your magical solution to distribute all resources evenly doesn’t really solve human driven climate change and destruction of our environments. And it’s not about convincing me ask yourself why would a commercial planet have too many staff members that’s bad for business.

        • LettyWhiterock@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          We can use resources without causing climate change. Hell human cause climate change is a pretty recent development when it comes to human history, and it’s not because there’s more people.

          And what the fuck are you talking about a “commercial planet” are you stupid.

          • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Human driven climate change is new, it is not sustainable. And commercial planet as in a commercial country you fucking moron.

            • LettyWhiterock@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              You’re right. It’s not sustainable. It’s not the result of overpopulation though.

              And yeah I still have no clue what that’s supposed to mean.

              • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                I don’t care about your opinion.

                And that’s fine I don’t care if you don’t care to even google what it might mean.

          • blackberry28@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            The explosion of the global population is also rather recent. Just 100 years ago global population was less than a quarter than it is today. And going back to the middle ages, earth didn’t even have half of a billion people. And resources for all those people need to come from somewhere, hard to do this without causing climate change.

            • LettyWhiterock@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Except it’s not the result of the population increase, it’s the result of industrialization.

              We have the resources. We can provide for everyone on earth easily without also destroying it.

              Otherwise if you genuinely thought there were too many people, you should logically kill yourself otherwise you’re a hypocrite.

              I’m not saying you actually should because that’s stupid, this whole idea is just ecofascism. But if you’re pushing this bullshit then you better follow through.

          • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            For real, if we had even resource distribution I’d be building solar or something useful, but I have a mortgage so I guess I’ll just keep having this chatbot analyze financial statistics or whatever the fuck I’m doing