Yea, it’s just that pedants deep down believe that good grammar is good writing; they don’t understand the difference. Therefore, they’re going to struggle to recognize good writing, and be incapable of producing it.
No- but since a good “meal” is subjective to the person eating it, one person calling it a bad meal is not a good metric to base your opinion on.
If the meal has seasonings you don’t like, or is missing components you do like (grammar, in this case)- it doesn’t make the meal bad. It just means it isn’t for you, and there is nothing wrong with that.
Yea, it’s just that pedants deep down believe that good grammar is good writing; they don’t understand the difference. Therefore, they’re going to struggle to recognize good writing, and be incapable of producing it.
It doesn’t take a chef to spot a bad meal.
No- but since a good “meal” is subjective to the person eating it, one person calling it a bad meal is not a good metric to base your opinion on.
If the meal has seasonings you don’t like, or is missing components you do like (grammar, in this case)- it doesn’t make the meal bad. It just means it isn’t for you, and there is nothing wrong with that.
Missing grammar is the wrong grammar. And that’s more akin to a spoiled component.
You literally just started your sentence with a conjunction. At the very least practice what you preach.
And?
My own bad grammar somehow makes my statement wrong?
And that’s your opinion. A subjective view of your own. See how that works?
“Missing grammar” is usually not an issue unless you’re reading self-published, unedited books.
Rarity of it makes it more pronounced