Because the “tool” is poisoning our water supply, burning our crops and delivering a plague unto our houses, only half-jokingly?
Also if “only” 99% of people use the autocomplete bot for nefarious/harmful uses, i fully believe the 1% should be deprived of the technology for the betterment of society. Id rather wait an extra 10 years for (insert pro ai talking point here) than let it continue to fuck every aspect of society including health, the economy, and entertainment.
I think that percentage could get as high as 33% “good actors” and 66% ignorant usage and still be valid.
All ai users are bastards, or something (obviously excluding high level STEM research, but even that is kinda sketchy; see mathematics atm)
Because the “tool” is poisoning our water supply, burning our crops and delivering a plague unto our houses, only half-jokingly?
Pivoting to other complaints entirely is not a sincere argument. You made a claim - someone countered it - you don’t get to pick another argument and maintain the same conclusion. That’s pretense.
Because the “tool” is poisoning our water supply, burning our crops and delivering a plague unto our houses, only half-jokingly?
Also if “only” 99% of people use the autocomplete bot for nefarious/harmful uses, i fully believe the 1% should be deprived of the technology for the betterment of society. Id rather wait an extra 10 years for (insert pro ai talking point here) than let it continue to fuck every aspect of society including health, the economy, and entertainment.
I think that percentage could get as high as 33% “good actors” and 66% ignorant usage and still be valid.
All ai users are bastards, or something (obviously excluding high level STEM research, but even that is kinda sketchy; see mathematics atm)
Pivoting to other complaints entirely is not a sincere argument. You made a claim - someone countered it - you don’t get to pick another argument and maintain the same conclusion. That’s pretense.